In a previous article, I explained the mechanics of the derivatives trade that cost JPMorgan (JPM)
billions. In that article I noted that it is nearly impossible to
estimate what the losses on that trade will ultimately be, as it is
difficult to know how much of the trade has been unwound and at what
price. A careful examination of the JPMorgan's financials in the coming quarter may shed some light on the matter, but...click here to read the full article on Seeking Alpha
Just to be clear: Spain isn't fooling anyone with its "We don't need outside assistance to stabilize our banking system rhetoric." On Tuesday, Spain indicated that two options are on the table regarding the 19 billion (or 25 billion if you count the 4.5 billion euros already given to the bank, or closer to 30 billion if Bankia's 2011 losses have to be made-up for...see here) recapitalization of the nation's fourth largest lender, ailing (zombie) Bankia...Spain will soon issue new bonds to fund its ailing banks and indebted regions despite borrowing costs nearing the unsustainable 7 percent level that forced other euro zone countries to seek international aid...A government source told Reuters on Tuesday Spain would likely recapitalise Bankia, which asked for 19 billion euros on Friday, by issuing new debt and possibly by tapping the cash from the bank restructuring fund and the Treasury.It is interesting that Spain would be so brazen as to actually suggest that its bank restructuring fund (the so-called FROB would be tapped to help solve the Bankia problem. How this is possible is a mystery given that the restructuring fund has only 5 billion euros remaining. Because, by our math at least, 5 billion euros does not equal 25 billion euros, the careful observer is led to believe (based on the two options presented by the government) that Spain will issue new debt to resuscitate Bankia, an option which is at least better than the original solution which was to fill Bankia's empty coffers with Spanish sovereign debt and tell the bank to pull the old Blazing Saddles trick on the ECB: Bankia puts a gun to its own head and tells the ECB it better accept the bonds as collateral for cash or its curtains..."One move and Bankia gets it". In any case, it speaks to how bad the situation is when Spain is forced to issue new debt in the worst possible environment for tapping the sovereign debt market just to keep its banking system from imploding completely.
CNBC devoted virtually the entire day to coverage of the Facebook IPO while Europe continued to slide towards oblivion (only Simon Hobbs seemed to care that shares of Bankia, which holds over 10% of all Spanish deposits, nearly flat-lined at one point)...Spain officially slid back into recession, Moody's cut ratings on 16 Spanish banks (noting that the Spanish government likely could not support them), and, most disturbing of all, Spain was forced to pay 5% to sell four year bonds, up a frightening 160 basis points from the last time Spain sold the notes.
Even as one arm of a brokerage firm is getting paid to drum up interest in a stock, another part of the firm could be earning big profits by helping bet that the stock will fall in price...Clients of Goldman, J.P. Morgan and other banks were also helping contribute to a downdraft in Facebook's shares...Many small traders said they weren't aware they were even allowed under securities law to short sell a stock so soon after an IPO.Of course they weren't aware. That's really the whole point here. Let's review all of the other material information small investors weren't aware of:
1) They weren't aware that Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and JP Morgan lowered their estimates for Facebook's full year and quarterly revenue and full year EPS (see here)The absurdity of this cannot be overstated: the underwriters knew Facebook was overvalued (their own estimates said so); they shared this information with large, 'important' investors, a move they knew would depress institutional demand and drive the price down; they knew the shares were being heavily shorted (after all, they were the ones lending them out); as if all of this wasn't enough to ensure the little guy would get screwed, Nasdaq didn't even have the decency to give mom and pop a decent fill on the shares.
2) They weren't aware that the unsettled trades from the 'glitch' in Nasdaq's system caused a surplus of shares (totaling $10 million) to be deposited into Nasdaq's 'error account' (see here)
3) They weren't aware that fills on their other trades were adversely affected by the failure of Nasdaq's system (see here)
4) They weren't aware that the very firm's touting the stock were lending the shares out for hedge funds to short (note that this is not an uncommon practice and as such there is certainly an argument to be made that the 'little guy' might want to do a little more research next time he decides to dive into a hot IPO the same way he should have read his mortgage agreement in 2006/2007 before he bought a $600,000 home when he made $35,000 per year)
It was an audacious debut for the newly elected French leader who, despite his placid manner next to his often pushy predecessor, Nicolas Sarkozy, believes firmly that Germany should not have the sole say in pulling Europe out of crisis..."The relationship with Germany is very important, but I am not keeping other countries at a distance," Hollande told reporters on his train ride to Brussels, another change in style from Sarkozy, who usually traveled in his presidential jet. "I want France to be heard and supported by other countries," he said. "I don't my relationship with Germany to be like an executive board that imposes itself on others."Although Germany's borrowing costs seem to hit fresh record lows on an almost daily basis, general economic conditions may be deteriorating along with the rest of the eurozone as business confidence fell in May and German manufacturing contracted at its quickest pace in nearly three years in April. If Germany's economy continues to slide, other nations will likely take it as yet another sign that the path of fiscal restraint is failing in Europe and should quickly be supplanted with pro-growth, spending initiatives before it is too late. Unfortunately, the further the can gets kicked down the road, the bigger the systemic risk the EU poses. Perhaps it is time to allow failing countries to default/exit...
With a Greek exit becoming increasingly likely (see here), the end is near for the EU.France and other, weaker EU members have begun pushing for “growth.” This in of itself reveals how clueless the political elite in the EU are (economic growth in Europe is synonymous with living beyond one’s means and/or living off of others… the very policies that have lead to the EU Crisis)...in the short term, you’re making a small difference, but in the big picture, you’re ignoring the very real, enormous problem you need to tackle...Those enormous problems are a massive debt overhang… which cannot be dealt with by the ECB, Fed, or even the IMF at this point. The Fed has already openly admitted that it cannot perform more aggressive easing (it is an election year in the US after all). The ECB has expanded its balance sheet to the point that its own solvency is in question. And the IMF, which is essentially a US-backed entity, cannot get funds from the Obama administration during an election year.


Apparently, a few investors were stuck with pretty awful fills, caused by the disastrous IPO of an unrelated stockTranslation: even if those of you playing at home were smart enough to stay away from Facebook shares, your trades in completely unrelated names may have been affected nonetheless. This doesn't bode well for bringing the retail investor (who has pulled money from domestic equity funds for 12 straight months--see here) back into the market.